Archives

Hip-hop artist Invincible, Complex Movements in GR for performance & dialogue with area community organizers

Complex Movements presents…

Beware of the Dandelions: 
Connecting Grassroots Communities in Detroit and Grand Rapids. 

at SiTE:LAB
(Old Public Museum 54 Jefferson)
Saturday Sep 22 6pm-9pm

REFLECT on the ways we approach the work of transforming ourselves, our communities, and the world

ENGAGE in conversation about networks, new forms of organization and leadership, drawing lessons from quantum physics, emergence, and other complex science theories

REDEFINE change from critical mass to critical connections, from growing our economy to growing our souls, from representative democracy to participatory self-governing communities

CONNECT communities working for change within Detroit and Grand Rapids to one another, and to communities around the world

Complex Movements collective member and Detroit hip-hop artist and activist Invincible will facilitate a workshop on these topics featuring community workers from Heartside Gallery, GRIID, Our Kitchen Table, The Bloom Collective4TLOHH and beyond. Participants will create the opportunity draw connections between small scale deep rooted community movement building happening in Grand Rapids and Detroit, through the lens of complex science and social movements.

An excerpt of Complex Movements installation performance piece “Three Phases” will also be presented as part of the workshop.

This event is FREE, ALL AGES, and ANTI-DISPLACEMENT

‘Complex Movements’ is a Detroit based artist collective composed of graphic designer/fine artist Wesley Taylor, music producer/filmmaker Waajeed, and hip-hop lyricist/activist Invincible. Their multimedia performance installations, hand crafted songs, and trans-genre experiments explore the relationship between complex science and social change movements. ‘Complex Movements’ is a recipient of the 2012 MAP Fund grant and Michigan ArtServe’s CSA grant. They have presented their work at The Detroit Science Center for Kresge’s Art X Detroit festival, Re:View Gallery, Network of Ensemble Theater’s Microfest, and Cranbrook Art Museum. They are joined at this installation by jeweler Tiff Massey, as well as creative technologists AJ Manoulian and Carlos (L05) Garcia.

EMERGENCEmedia.org

2012 Farm Bill rewards large agri-business, punishes small farmers and low income families

“The House Agriculture Committee Farm Bill cuts $16 billion from SNAP benefits, primarily by limiting eligibility. The Committee rejected an effort to make the cuts even steeper (by applying the draconian Ryan Budget cuts) but also rejected an effort to restore the SNAP cuts or use the lower level of $4 billion in cuts in the Senate Farm bill.”

This is reposted from www.GRIID.org

Yesterday, MLive ran a story citing Michigan Senator Debbie Stabenow who believes that the 2012 Farm Bill that passed in the Senate and is being voted on in the House today is a “win for Michigan.”

Actually, the MLive posting wasn’t much of an article, since it was mainly a re-printing of a statement from Senator Stabenow, with no other voices or a critical assessment of the version of the bill passed by the Senate.

The version passed by the Senate is not a win for Michigan, unless you define Michigan as big business. According to Food & Water Watch, which has been organizing a campaign to get the federal government to pass a Fair Farm Bill, the Senate passed version of the Farm Bill benefits the large agri-businesses in the US, not small farmers or a sustainable food system.

Although the Senate bill made changes to commodity policy that will be touted as reform,the bill reinforced prior farm policies that favor large industrial-scale agriculture and overproduction of commodity crops like corn and soybeans. Only a few companies sell what farmers need (like seeds, fertilizer and tractors) and only a few firms buy what farmers raise, which means they pay more for supplies and get less for their crops and livestock. The four largest companies in each industry slaughter nearly all the beef, process two-thirds of the pork, sell half the groceries and process about half the milk in the United States.

This is no accident. It’s the direct result of lobbying campaigns by major agribusinesses, industry trade associations and the policies that Congress passed on their behalf. And the process in which the Farm Bill was decided is even more disconcerting. Started in secretunder the guise of the Supercommittee budget slashing process last fall, the farm bill has had little input from anyone other than a handful of legislators and the Big Ag lobbyists who pay the most to play. The secret farm bill developed for the Supercommittee got scant scrutiny from the Senate Agriculture Committee. The 1,000-page proposal was released only a few days before the Committee finalized the nearly trillion-dollar legislation in three short hours  – that’s about $90 million a second.

Then, when the Farm Bill finally made its way to the Senate’s agenda last week, nearly 300 amendments flooded in. From the absurd (ending the federal food stamp program and taking on Canadian geese) – to the outright irrelevant  (aid to Pakistan and protecting the Pentagon budget), many of the amendments had little to do with farming or food.

The House version of the bill was introduced last week and might be decided on today. The MLive story mentions this in one sentence, but offers up no information on what is in the House version of the Farm Bill, nor where Michigan members of Congress stand on this issue.

Again, according to Food & Water Watch, the House version so far has not been a benefit to the public. They state:

Most of today’s action was related to the nutrition title, which primarily funds the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as food stamps). The House Agriculture Committee Farm Bill cuts $16 billion from SNAP benefits, primarily by limiting eligibility. The Committee rejected an effort to make the cuts even steeper (by applying the draconian Ryan Budget cuts) but also rejected an effort to restore the SNAP cuts or use the lower level of $4 billion in cuts in the Senate Farm bill.

So, it not only appears that the Farm Bill will maintain the tax payer subsidies to big Ag, it will continue massive support for factory farms, unsustainable agriculture practices and punish low income families with cuts to food assistance. One more reason why we need a food revolution!

Free Webinar, The Autism Revolution: Thinking about environment and food

Healthy Food Action invites you to attend this Healthy Food, Healthy Farms Webinar Series presention 

Monday, June 11, 2012  12pm PDT/3pm EDT.

Conditions affecting children’s behavior and brain development, like autism and ADHD, are exploding in prevalence. The CDC estimates autism now is diagnosed in 1-in-88 children, a more than 70 percent increase over just six years. These increases leave many parents, and clinicians, with questions about what’s causing autism and how we can work to prevent it.

Join us on June 11 where we’ll hear from Martha Herbert, MD, PhD, a Harvard pediatric neurologist with a brand new book, The Autism Revolution: Whole body strategies for making life all it can be. Renee Dufault,a retired FDA toxicologist and former officer in the US Public Health Service, has coauthored three recent peer-reviewed studies, the latest of which has been published in the Journal of Clinical Epigenetics. The study models how certain dietary factors like vitamin deficiencies or high fructose corn syrup consumption could impact complex metabolic functions governing the body’s ability to eliminate toxic chemicals, indirectly contributing to autism and other disorders. Kathleen Schuler of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy moderates.

REGISTER NOW!


This entry was posted on May 23, 2012, in Policy.

Protect Michigan’s Yard Debris Ban

This message is reposted from the US Composting Council’s Protect Michigan’s Yard Debris Ban campaign. Click here to send the message to your senator that the curent yard waste law needs to stay in effect.

Michigan HB 4265 and HB 4266 would exempt landfills with gas recovery systems from the state’s longstanding ban on landfill disposal of yard trimmings.

There are many reasons to oppose these Grass-to-Landfill Gas bills including:

  • Will hurt or put out of business the 75 operations registered in Michigan as composting facilities. Along with this will be a loss of potentially hundreds of jobs.  According to The Institute for Local Self Reliance, on a per-ton basis, composting creates four times as many jobs as landfilling or incinerating the same material.
  • Will not contribute to energy independence. Yard trimmings, due to its high lignin content, decomposes slowly and only partially in a landfill environment, contributing an insignificant amount to Michigan’s energy needs. The landfill energy argument is a convenient smoke screen to obscure the real goal:  increased revenues at landfills at the expense of recovery via composting.
  • Will hurt the environment. Landfill gas collection systems capture 60 to 90% at various times of operation, according to the EPA.  The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change acknowledges that over a landfill’s entire life that rate may be as low as 20%.  The remainder of the methane is released to the atmosphere.  Landfill gases have been viewed historically as local nuisances.  We now know these gases have the potential to impact our environment today and in the future.  The global warming impact of methane is 25 times higher than carbon dioxide.  Reducing the amount of biodegradable materials flowing into landfills – such as through composting – is the best way to reduce methane landfill emissions. Composting also has numerous other environmental benefits including improved water dynamics, reduced irrigation needs, healthier plants, and improved stormwater management.  Michigan’s composts could reap many benefits for the state’s agricultural crops.
  • Landfills do not responsibly process yard trimmings.  Contrary to landfill gas industry claims, landfills are not equally capable of responsibly processing yard trimmings as compost operations.  Compost is a valuable soil amendment product with multiple and growing markets. It is widely recognized for its ability to restore depleted soils, manage erosion, and increase crop yields.  Compost is a high-value product.  Furthermore, landfill bans extend the life of landfills, thereby reducing the costs of siting, zoning, building, and maintaining new landfills in the State.
  • Contradicts Michigan’s own laws. Act 451, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, Part 115, Solid Waste Management, section 324/11514, states in part “The state shall develop policies and practices that promote recycling and reuse of materials and, to the extent practical, minimize the use of landfilling as a method for disposal of its waste.” Burying yard trimmings in landfills, methane collection or not, is NOT recycling, because there is no return to use.  Capturing landfill gas is not a form of recycling.  It is an end-of-pipe option.
  • Primarily benefits one corporation at the expense of many Michigan businesses.  By far the biggest beneficiary of this legislation would be the Granger corporation, which operates 16 landfill gas projects in six states.   But it would jeopardize the operations of dozens of businesses and hamper the ability to grow the composting industry in Michigan at a time when composting is expanding from coast to coast.  Composters and other recyclers of organic waste are generating high value products used to support a variety of important industries, such as agriculture, horticulture, landscaping, stormwater management, and erosion control.  Markets for compost continue to grow.
  • This legislation co-mingles trimmings and solid waste.  This would allow importation of out-of-state yard waste into Michigan landfills, turning Michigan into a waste dump
  • Contradicts the position of Solid Waste Management Association of North America (SWANA), the national association representing the landfill industry. In a joint position statement in 2006 by SWANA and the USCC, it states that advances in landfill technology “should be accomplished without encouraging more organics to be placed in landfills, and without reversing hard won and effective programs and regulatory efforts that have raised recycling rates for organic residuals. Energy recovery, in bioreactor or conventional landfills, must be pursued without relaxing recycling initiatives and without improperly creating incentives for more land disposal.” The joint position paper is attached for your review.
This entry was posted on April 13, 2012, in Policy.